Most teams guess, and guess low.

The raw share of lines a model produced is usually a large number and a misleading one. The figure that matters is how much AI-written code survived review and is still in production — and how much of the file nobody can account for at all.

What you get out of the session

AI-authored share by repository and by file
Which coding agents were actually used
Which models, where the tool records them
The proportion of lines that cannot be attributed
How much of the history predates any recorder
Whether hand edits were being counted as AI work
Directories where AI authorship is concentrated
A dated report you can keep
The definition behind every figure
An honest view of what the method cannot see

What it is not

Not a scan of your source

Nothing is uploaded. The recorder reads transcripts and files locally on the machine you run it on.

Not a score

There is no grade and no benchmark. AI authorship is a fact to be known, not a target to be hit.

Not a sales trap

If the answer is that your history is unrecoverable, that is the answer, and we will say so.

Bring the repository you are least comfortable about.

Thirty minutes, one codebase, and a number you can defend afterwards.