Healthcare
Software that carries clinical risk
Design history files were not written with coding agents in mind.
Regulated medical software expects traceability from requirement to implementation to verification. A coding agent inserts an author into that chain that your documentation has no field for. PromptWake records that author, so the trace stays unbroken.
Nobody asks how AI-written code entered a repository until something goes wrong or somebody audits it — and by then the record either exists or it does not. PromptWake is cheap to run before you need it and impossible to reconstruct afterwards.
Questions this sector asks
Is PromptWake a validated system?
No, and no tool should tell you otherwise about your own validation. It produces evidence that goes into your process; validating that process remains your responsibility.
Does patient data end up in the record?
Only if it is in your prompts. Capture is local by default, secrets are stripped before writing, and self-hosting keeps everything inside your own environment.
How far back can we go?
To the point the recorder was installed. Earlier code is reported as unknown rather than attributed, which is why starting before you need the evidence matters.
Clinical software is audited on its record, not its intent.
See what a month of AI-assisted development looks like when it is written down as it happens.